Accessible link-page design: a practical starting checklist
Plan readable content, meaningful controls, keyboard access, useful image alternatives, and understandable forms on a small business page.
The useful takeaway
Accessibility is part of the whole journey, including the destinations and forms behind your links.
An accessible link page helps people use it in different ways: with a keyboard, a screen reader, enlarged text, touch, or other assistive technology. A small page is not automatically accessible simply because it contains few elements. Its controls, content, visual choices, and linked destinations all matter. Start with practical checks while recognizing that a checklist cannot prove complete accessibility.
Give the page a meaningful structure
Use a descriptive page title and a clear main heading. Organize related content under headings that explain the section rather than serving as decorative slogans. Keep the reading order sensible. Someone moving through headings or links should encounter the same broad story as someone looking at the visual layout.
If you use a builder, inspect what its components actually produce where possible or ask the provider about accessibility support. A large bold text block may look like a heading without being represented as one. Similarly, an element that looks like a button may not behave correctly with a keyboard. Choose standard, well-supported controls and avoid custom interactions when a normal link or form control would serve the task.
Check readable text and useful contrast
Text should remain readable when enlarged, and important content should not disappear because a box has a fixed height. Avoid placing essential wording only in an image. For color, check actual foreground and background combinations rather than judging a palette in isolation. Transparent overlays and photographs can produce different contrast across the same line of text.
WCAG's minimum contrast explanation specifies 4.5:1 for ordinary text and 3:1 for qualifying large text, with defined exceptions. Use a contrast checker and understand the conditions rather than assuming any large-looking headline qualifies. Color should not be the only signal of an error, selected state, or available action. Add words or other meaningful cues so the information survives changes in color perception.
Make links and controls understandable
Write labels that identify what a link opens or what an action does. Repeated Read more labels can be ambiguous, particularly when encountered outside their visual cards. Ensure the visible wording remains aligned with the accessible name. For touch controls, review the W3C target-size guidance and provide practical space between neighboring actions.
Use the keyboard to move through the page. You should be able to see where focus is and reach the interactive elements in a sensible sequence. Test menus, dialogs, embedded widgets, and close controls, not only the main buttons. A visually attractive overlay can become a serious barrier if it traps navigation or hides the element that currently has focus.
Treat media and forms as part of the task
Choose text alternatives based on what an image contributes. A product photograph may need a useful description, while a purely decorative flourish should not be announced as meaningful content. Videos need appropriate accessible alternatives, such as accurate captions for speech, and should not be the only place where essential instructions appear.
Forms need clear labels, understandable required fields, and helpful error messages. The W3C forms tutorial covers labels, instructions, validation, and feedback. Apply those principles to the destination as well as the link page. If the page routes visitors to an inaccessible booking widget, a tidy front door does not make the overall booking journey usable. Keep an accessible alternative contact route where you can support it.
Use checks to identify work, not declare perfection
Begin with a repeatable review and document what you checked. Include the device, browser, relevant assistive technology if used, and the task. Do not publish a claim of full compliance based solely on an automated score or a quick keyboard pass. W3C's preliminary checks explicitly describe their limited scope.
Prioritize barriers that prevent people from completing important tasks, then broaden the evaluation. Where possible, involve people with relevant access needs and qualified accessibility practitioners. Keep findings specific so improvements are actionable: The calendar cannot be operated with the keyboard is more useful than The page needs accessibility work. Recheck after major content, theme, or widget changes.
- Read the page with enlarged text and inspect clipping or missing content.
- Navigate all interactive elements using a keyboard and inspect visible focus.
- Check text contrast against the backgrounds actually used.
- Review links and image alternatives for meaningful purpose.
- Complete forms, including an error and a successful result.
- Check essential external destinations and document barriers outside your direct control.
Sources & further reading
References for the principles and technical details in this guide.
- Easy accessibility checks — W3C
- Understanding minimum contrast — W3C
- Forms tutorial — W3C
- Understanding target size — W3C
Found something that needs correcting? Send us a correction.